Main

May 21, 2008

It's Been A While...

But here's something worth posting for posterity, I think.

Back Talk: Tod Papageorge

Well, photographers and poets, their glory and their shame--that's a quote from Auden, the glory and the shame--is that a poet has to depend upon words, these words. "Cup"--it's so mundane and common--but Robert Frost would say, "fill a cup up/Up to the brim, and even above the brim." The word becomes transformed, ideally. So the curse of the poet is, he has to use all of this pain quotidien to make magic. And it's the same with the photographer. He's stuck with the things of the world to transform. What you must understand is that the effort involved here in making these pictures or any that I've made is to make visual poetry. In other words, to use the material of the world as the stuff of transformation into meaning. So whether those facts or those pieces of material bear any kind of conclusive or direct line of connection to the truth is totally irrelevant to me. This has nothing to do with the truth! This is a book of poetry. Whether you respond to it that way is something I can't be concerned with. But that's the ambition.

November 26, 2007

NaNo Days 22, 23, 24, & 25

Day #22:
Thanksgiving Day Off! The day started slow and distracted by this and that. Feeding cats. Drinking coffee. Reading the newspaper and electronic mail. Deciding on paper stock for my poetry chapbook. Getting the priority mail packet ready for sending tomorrow. Stripping the bed sheets. Retrieving bowls and ingredients so J. can make cornbread for the turkey stuffing and Bourbon Spiked Yams we are taking to our Thanksgiving dinner later today. So, I gave myself to have a NaNo day off since I'm close to the word count goal anyway and, truth to tell, novel machinations and logic and plots twists and turns and a conclusion are not really on my mind today. Holiday mode I guess. And the Bob-fest continues: John Wesley Harding and now Time Out of Mind this morning.

Day #23:
J's home from work today so I think this will be another holiday. While the crazy people raise their stress levels with shopping, I'm looking forward to a very calm day. We have errands including sending my manuscript off to the publisher and getting a new battery for the truck. I should have anticipated this novel writing derailment because of holiday energy. It really doesn't matter since I'm far ahead on my word count, basically done if I want to not finesse some kind of respectable ending. No big deal either way. Sun's out, cold, great day for a walk, and taking the bus downtown to see the Bob Dylan movie.

Day #24
More novel shirking. Today was huddling by the gas fireplace, re-reading Bob Dylan's Chronicles: Volume One, before going downtown to meet friends at South Park (restaurant not the T.V. show) for happy hour. And having AAA jump-start the truck and install a new battery. And a nap. And watching the naughty backyard squirrel taunting and teasing my cats. And reading the New Yorker. And a few essays about poetry and poetics. I guess that is the point: it's easy to lose the novel-writing thread when you take a few days off. Maybe Sunday I'll feel like being back in a groove.

Day #25
One more day to not write on the novel project. I'm nearly done so it's been good to let myself take the break. It was sunny and the day got a late start and I'm on the edge of getting a cold or something and it was a good day for a long walk and wrapping white twinkling lights into the rhododendron trees in front of the house. Not inhabiting the minds of imaginary characters. Monday I'll be back "on it" to quote Margene on Big Love.

November 20, 2007

NaNoWriMo: Days 17, 18, 19, 20

NANO DAY #17
Saturday morning, rainy, fog, gray. J. back from his week in DC. We are off to look at houses with a realtor in a couple of hours. I’d like to run errands, stop by the library, maybe see a matinee or make a nice dinner, finish my Kate Atkinson book. So I’m taking at least the morning off, possibly the whole day, from novel-writing. I hate to say this but all that seems much more interesting and fun to me than sitting around adding more words to a shitty novel that will never make it out the running gate. Bad attitude? Or realistic? After reading the interview with Norman Mailer in the most recent Paris Review, I’d say the latter. I guess I am ready for a change...


NANO DAY #18

Low-word count day here as it’s a Sunday morning after a bad night of sleep with wheezing and feeling like I am coming down with a cold. I know that’s no excuse but, between that and the ongoing PMS, I just don’t have the fiction-writing drive inside me today. Sometimes feeling unwell in the body trumps everything else.

Yesterday, I finished One Good Turn, Kate Atkinson’s wonderful (second) Jackson Brodie "mystery" novel. I’m not sure assigning this novel to the Mystery section (as the library has done) does the humor, irony, complexity, and biting social commentary of her work justice. She’s just so good. It makes me want to throw in the towel re: writing even mildly decent fiction and get a lot more honest and real with myself about what I am and am not going to write from here on out.

Meanwhile, the galleys of my poetry book are arriving by priority mail Monday or Tuesday. I have to make sure to make time to celebrate and feel excited about that because, really, it is a milestone and I do feel proud. I did it—thanks to my tenacity and doggedness and a great deal of feedback from L. and B. in our chapbook on-line class. It is still hard to believe I am such a beginner, returning to seriously think about writing poetry barely two years ago and already, to have this book. After all those years struggling with fiction, the rejections and then the eye-opening lesson in all that dreck that is the Tin House unsolicited manuscripts pile. I think I already know the answer about me and fiction—actually, I’ve known for quite some time but remained somehow unwilling to speak it to the world—was that it? Or is it even more difficult and complex, something about me feeling that IF I admit I don’t want to do this—for a ton of carefully considered and defensible reasons, somehow it marks me as a failure. In whose eyes? My own or some other outside of me I shouldn’t be listening to anyway? A voice I should have exorcised long ago?

Still, I’ll continue with NaNoWriMo just for the hell of it. I have to be able to crank out another 10,000 words in the remaining days. Maybe I’ll even have something to show for it by the end. Not that anyone would want to read it!


NANO DAY #19

I think today I’ve finally concluded? realized? accepted? that (of course) I am writing a novel that is more like a collection of linked stories. Which is fine. And what I really loved about many books I read including Joan Silber’s book, Ideas of Heaven. It’s also a way to have more characters who may or may not have to be related (something I love about Kate Atkinson’s books) and a way to tell a story like a kaleidoscope or a necklace, images I used when I was first thinking about doing NaNoWriMo. And it is the kind of fiction I often prefer to read and therefore what kind I should be writing. So maybe my NaNo mess can actually be pared and edited into something, in spite of all my negative feelings about its shapeless idiocy the past week and that this was only an exercise in piloting me back to poetry.

And more realizations. (Again, these have been known for a while but I guess I was in denial or some state of refusing to accept them?

I am not a plodding, plot-driven person. This happened, then this happened, then that. Or what if Mr. A decided to do X to Ms. B and then run away with Mrs. C., what happens then? For some reason writing like that bores me. Not able to fool with the nuances of language enough? Not poetic enough? Not fracturing and bending narrative to stir up questions enough? I don’t mind reading books that do that. Far from it. But the stuff that I learn from, that intrigues me, that I guess I would say are some of my all-time favorites—Ulysses, Proust, Beloved, Michael Ondaatje’s work, Denis Johnson, even Alice Munro—that material hardly follows a straight line.

So a good NaNo morning as I inch close to come kind of end. I suppose if I get to 50K before November 30th, I can keep adding more or go back and see what is salvageable and could work as a coherent whole from what I’ve already done.

NANO DAY #20
I woke, made coffee, wrote in my journal, drank more coffee, worked on the NaNo pages, updated my word count, drank more coffee, and am now turning to the rest of the day. There is sun down south of here in the Willamette Valley; soon, it’s supposed to make an appearance here.

I suppose it feels like an even longer month, a long, lonely novel-writing slog, when you don’t approach this like a party and go to NaNo events and interact with people from your NaNo home region and have a passel of NaNo buddies and, in general, make this Something to Remember rather than the basic Nothing it’s turning out to be for me. Not that I anticipated anything much different. I’m not a socializing writer. I have my routine and then move on to whatever is next in my day. I don’t have a tribe to turn to for therapy or angst-sharing about whether or not I’m doing the work. Even if I did, I’m not sure I would. That said, it would be good to have a handful of friends to call and chat with about this writing life and work. I think that is what could be had by joining a real, functioning writing group here in Portland. I’ll wait and see if the Attic workshop morphs into anything like that. I suppose there’s always placing a note on Craig’s List.

It seems this NaNo is just another excuse to party for some of the participants. To feel connected to and part of something that a collective we are doing, have done, and can wear the T-shirts to prove it. One more attempt to bring together (Internet-enabled) like-minded souls. Except it’s not for me. Because, if there’s one thing that I’ve learned this month it’s that getting to the 50,000 the word count isn’t the problem. I have written, am able to write, have made writing the priority in my life. One of the big issues for me is the why. Why do I think I want to do this? What am I trying to prove? And to whom? And for what? Seems that after my NaNo sessions nearly every one of these twenty days so far, I’ve also spend some time reflecting about these concerns. Soul-searching some might call it. More realistically, it’s an attempt to figure out why something that (increasingly) comes easily to me (the words, not necessarily all the other novel subtleties) is something I don’t enjoy or find fun. I think it’s because I only like the words, that I maybe even hate all the mechanics, all those other novelistic nuances and subtleties. I know, this month we are only supposed to get the words down and out and counted up. And I have obviously done that. But to what end? Is that what my lesson in all of this is? To practice letting go of outcomes? of achievement? Of adding this as another notch on the resume belt?

It seems this NaNoWriMo might be best suited to those who say they want to write (and maybe even do want to write) but never find or make the time. And those who need a kick in the pants to just do it. And those lucky who have a great idea with lots of momentum and energy and need to get it down fast as possible so that it can then become what it is meant to be under revision. And let’s face facts: most of the 50,000 word novels written by would-be novelists this month will suck. Won’t go anywhere. Never needed to be written in the first place. And I definitely would have no interest in reading them. There is (I agree) something to be said for sticking with a project. That, indeed, was a lot of the energy in Chris Baty’s book, No Plot? No Problem. Participate, stick to it, have something to show at the end that says you stuck do it and met your goal. All well and good in terms of the perhaps-Zen-like, in-the-moment, unattached-to-outcomes element of such an endeavor. Not so great in terms of foolishly wasting precious time I could be devoting to other projects, work, etc. Maybe I’m sounding like a tedious 50-something here, what with this obsession with efficient use of the time I’ve got in the “rest of my life”—rather than going with the fun, the flow, the living in the moment. Unfortunately, I’ve been there and done that and it’s in large part why my first book of writing (albeit poetry not fiction) hasn’t come out until now.

I guess thought it would be a useful exercise for me because of the Inner Editor on Vacation part. And, in light of that, it has been. But mostly what I’ve discovered are two things that actually seem in opposition to one another: (1) While it’s relatively easy for me to amass words, that once started and committed to daily writing practice on a subject or even a project, they tumble out. (2) Still, I mostly don’t have any interest in sustaining the interest or drive or energy to figure out to shape them into a novel anyone would ever want to read.

Read my lips: I am not a novelist. Now, can I just accept this fact and (finally, definitively, once and for all) move the hell on?

November 16, 2007

NaNoWriMo: Days 13, 14, 15, 16

DAY #13

You meet your destiny on the road you take to avoid it.
- Carl Jung

That was the peace quote in my e-mail this morning. Much food for thought.

I should be typing these words in one of the rooms at the back of the house because that’s where the sun is pouring in its early morning light, most welcome after yesterdays Sturm und Drang. One cat is on the back of the couch, his perch so he can look out the window at the passing people and cars; the other is curled up in an African basket underneath the coffee table. It’s a much better morning than yesterday and all because of the abundant light.

I actually did two NaNo sessions in one yesterday so, technically, I’m free to have a day off today. Again, I reworked a piece from earlier so it was far from a challenge. So what I’m planning is to do another session this morning, post-cereal and shower. I also need to go through and list all the various chapters I’ve made up in the order I have them to see if 1) there is any narrative flow and sense as to what follows what and 2) figure out what gaps and missing scenes I need to fill in. I actually rather like what feels like a bit of random juxtaposition of these various non-linear bits.

I was noticing that Kate Atkinson does something similar and to quite a strong effect in the novel I’m now reading, One Good Turn. Shell start in a character’s present moment, let’s say Martin the mystery novelist. Then travel back to a field trip to a prison with his writing group, then back to his days at school, then a scene with his agent and finally, back to the present where she has him meet up with Jackson, her main character and now-ex detective. I don’t know about her other readers, but I happily follow her along. I guess its because she gets inside these quirky, flawed people and offers them up with both tenderness and humor.

Anyhow, I am hoping to be surprised and not thoroughly depressed and/or disgusted by what I notice as I scroll back through the 104 pages I’ve somehow already amassed! Novel-in-a-month. Wow!

DAY #14

I wrote for a couple of hours with cold hands and often shivering because I didn’t bother to change out of flannel PJs or to turn on the heat. It must be colder outside today as it stayed about 59 degrees in here in spite of the gas fireplace. Maybe I was able to keep going because I was writing a scene with a campfire in it. Or maybe I lost myself in the continuous, fictional dream as I think John Gardner calls it. All I know is that now its time for a banana smoothie and a hot shower. After that I’ll decide if I want to crank further beyond today’s 1900 words.

It is absolutely great to have the evil Inner Editor on vacation—and necessary for a crazy project like this novel-in-a-month. Otherwise Id have to be worrying that I have at least three narrative threads going at once, all of them flailing about and nowhere near resolved. If I followed every one down its primrose fictional path, I’d have a (most likely unreadable, uninteresting) novel the length of War and Peace. But all that is OK because this is a rough draft, its impossible to write a finished novel in a month, and isnt it with revision that we truly figure out which story we are meant to tell?

It has evolved that it works better for me to dive in, almost helter skelter, into some writing every day and then figure out where it might fit after the fact. Crazy quilt. Necklace with differently-sized and colored beads. An olio, isn’t that the crossword puzzle word, the one that means a stew or cooking pot, a miscellaneous mélange of things? Pick which metaphor for this project works. Of course this means, at least for now, there are many jarring jolts in the flow of the overall book. Big stuff like point-of-view shifts (whose story is this anyway?) and yet-unclarified timelines (just when is this particular scene, chapter, section taking place anyway? and did they really have mobile phones back then?)—that sort of thing. Egregious errors of basic writing craft let alone the requisite attention to detail, but what the hell? Were after word count and not anything that makes any sense, right?

I continue to be amazed at how much writing I’ve done over the years. I have been taking this writing life seriously for quite some time! I suppose I could be distressed that more of it didn’t “go anywhere.” I guess by that I mean getting something published, even though much of what gets published doesn’t sell and isn’t read by much of anyone and ends up on the remainder shelf. Of course, it may be simply that my fiction isn’t good enough. Truth to tell, I find what I write a little boring at times but then I have no desire or inclination (as of yet) to change that.

So maybe I should head back into therapy to sort out why I seem to have had trouble bringing these projects to a satisfying completion. Not that that would mean publication either. Assuming, again, that is the end game in all of why we sit here, typing away, trying to make new worlds with words. I have to resist feeling like a failure because I’ve accumulated all this material and it remains vague and shapeless, incoherent at times and likely full of cliché. If the only thing I get out of this November novel project is acknowledging how much hard work I’ve done to become a better writer over the years, then that will be a good thing.

Also, an insight that occurred to me yesterday: I couldn’t be successfully writing poetry if I hadn’t taken the time to apprentice myself all these to better learn how to be concrete and specific, how to self-edit, how to manage the flow and energy of lines and paragraphs in prose. I may not want to be a novelist, I may no longer care to write (let alone read) short stories but all of this hard work has not been for naught.

Later after more writing:

Maybe it’s the shivering that makes a person stick with the words and do a yeowoman’s extra word count duty on a blustery Wednesday morning. Or maybe it was the sex scene. The first graphic one I’ve let into the novel. I haven’t sorted how much of a sexy, sexual sub-text I want this novel to have. That’s one of the many narrative threads that, for now, is all clouded up. Just keep writing, right, and then when the shapeless blob reaches 50,000 words (which also, hopefully, means some kind of respectable end) then see what plot lines jump out and need further developing, see which characters you really want to spend more time with and learn more about, including all the secrets.

I have too many characters in the draft so far, too. Or at least too many differently-named people to keep track of, and who may or may not matter to the advancement of the story. Today I did a party scene and that required a crowd of attendees. Or so I thought. It will be interesting to read this all through at the end and see what jumps out, what zings. And if, God forbid, I want to continue working with it.

Apparently, there is NaNoEdMo for editing and revision in March. Yikes!

One other item worth noting: a while back, I wrote the following in the “current projects” section on my website, about something I planned to do in 2007:

I’ve returned to my many writings-to-date about the anthracite coal region of northeastern Pennsylvania—where I grew up—as springboard for maybe a new poetry chapbook, Meander.

In many ways, that’s what this near-two weeks of NaNoWriMo has been for me, a revisiting of ideas and themes and fixations about home and exile, about the idea of returning and what repercussions that might have. It seems without meaning too, or even conciously, I’ve begun to work on mining my writing about the place where I grew up.

DAY #15

The halfway mark.
Today was diving into the VISTA house pot luck hippie dinner scene and Hank and Irene taking their first walk down to the river. I should have put on some vintage Neil Young for inspiration but, instead, I worked away. Two+ hours with the laptop on my lap and me sitting in front of the couch with the gas fire roaring (can gas fireplaces roar?) I meet the daily NaNo word count short one word. And Hank has finally begun to woo Irene. If it can be called wooing when you go from a shared joint to the back seat of a junker car.

The NaNo advice that came via e-mail this morning was to jump around, write whatever scenes appeal and worry about how they all fit together later, which is exactly (mostly) what I’ve been doing. I have gone back a few times and looked at my current line-up to see if in any way, shape, or form, it might be said to flow. But I haven’t dwelled on that. Move on, type more, go for more word count. I’m at 37,567 words and 128 pages as of today. Of course, I also went back and looked at the 233 I’d amassed on my grad school novel way back when. A brief skimming through the various sections and I wanted to puke. No wonder no one wanted to publish it. So much of the writing totally sucks. There is something to be said for the wisdom one acquires with age and the continued, so often humbling practice of working with words.

Walter Mosley is definitely right. If you show up and spend a couple hours writing, sooner or later you amass a book. Of course he writes ones about a great character, Easy Rawlins, and his don’t suck and need years of wrenching revision like what I am working on now. But I have been showing up and we are now halfway through the month of November. At this point, I suspect I’ll easily make it to 50,000 words. But will it be interesting, populated with engaging and complex characters? Readable? Will it actually have a coherent plot line or two? A climax? A conclusion?

In the next fifteen days, all that remains to be seen.

NANO DAY #16

Today, Friday, Day #16 of NaNo, past the halfway point, I don’t feel like writing. I’ve been awake an hour and did my journal, found a poem on the Nation website that I read and liked yesterday (before leaving the mag in the rack at the Kennedy School for someone else to find and read) and bought our tickets for our 2008 pilgrimage to the Oregon Shakespeare Festival. Today was the day the first category of our membership was allowed to buy and I wanted to get the jump on good seats.

Very rainy outside this morning. This may be my day off from walking, too. A good day to be in the kitchen making soups, listening to the radio or CDs. Chopping carrots and celery might be just the rhythm my imagination needs in order to get a feeling of where in this damn novel I need to fill in the holes, and where I need to dig deeper.

I can already feel that Irene needs more obsessions—like Jackson Brodie, the main character in Kate Atkinson’s latest books. He’s got his listening to all the soulful country girl singers like Lucinda and EmmyLou and Trisha, moving to France, the basic melancholy dreariness of life once you get to be of a certain middle age. Right now, Irene isn’t fully formed in many sections of the so-called novel. She seems to me to be simply out there, wandering, reacting, mostly observing. Maybe she could be learning Italian—why? Or Meanders little literary angel trying to put her already-read magazines in public places where others will find and perhaps be enlightened by then? Or leaving books to be found—wasn’t there some project that actually encouraged people to do that? Not unlike the “find a red book” treasure hunt that was part of the Wordstock Literary Festival. I’ll have to muse on this more.

As well as ask myself, does this story really need to be told? If yes, why? And why me to tell it? And if yes, whose story is it? what is it really about?

I went through the whole mess a few days ago, charting the rise and fall of action, the connecting between one chapter and the next. I can see it’s easy to lose sight of what you’re accumulating particularly when you are in crank-out-the-words mode. I’m not quite ready to waste printer ink and print out the whole to-date draft. Maybe next week.

A crow is perched on a thick black wire that runs to a telephone pole. Another flies off into the tree across the street. Cars going down 22nd have their lights on, to pierce the gray of this day. I drink my smoothie and ask myself, what would Irene do? But maybe that’s the issue. Maybe I can’t inhabit Irene.

November 12, 2007

NaNoWriMo: Days 9, 10, 11, 12

NaNo Day #9

OK, it’s Friday. And I really and truly did have to go out on errands first thing to see if the local dry cleaner over by the post office on Killingsworth, could get J.’s shirts done by Saturday as he needs them for his trip to DC next week. And, never one to do only one thing while I’m out and about, (especially these days of trying not to drive too much) I also headed up to Acme Mirror on Alberta to get a piece of glass cut and installed in the carved teak frame I got at The Monkey and the Rat a few weeks back. They’re closed on Saturdays which is why that minor project has taken so long. And then I headed out on my adventure to find Joes, formerly G.I. Joes, a sporting goods/outdoor mega-store, to buy another pedometer as mine has gone MIA. All that took about an hour. Then, upon returning, I had a message to call Sharon, the editor of the poetry anthology about bridges that my poem will be appearing in. So I did that. Then, finally, after a few pieces of vegie/cheese corn bread for inspiration, I turned to the novel words.

Earlier this morning, I reviewed some of the pitfalls often experienced in Week #2 of NaNoWriMo in No Plot, No Problem earlier this morning, I had already (tentatively) decided that I might not pick up where I left off yesterday because I was so bored with it and that, to energize myself and continue with the writing, and I might need a character coup. As Chris Baty describes it, a character coup is when you are bored with all your main characters and decided to abandon them or maybe even literally kill them off and let a stranger, quirkier minor character take the lead instead. Which is what I did.

I opened up a file with notes from way back when—a very sketchy freewrite of Irene leaving a bar and going to a cemetery—and started to type. I let Lance Franklin into the scene and now I’m thinking I may just turn the whole damn shapeless sweater mess into the serial murder comedy J. wanted me to write from the beginning, the one about a guy who is killing off everyone who had higher GPAs than him in the high school class so he can be #1 at the next reunion. The good news is I cranked out about half of the daily quote just rambling on about this and that. I may see if, post-lunch, I get a second wind and feel like further fleshing Lance out.

Not to jump the gun—because this NaNo is about the process not the product, let’s not forget—but I have pretty much (already) come to the conclusion that I really do not like working on a novel, that it isn’t my strong suit when it comes to writing. I seem to quickly lose my interest and desire to figure out the whole ball of wax that is creating believeable characters you want to learn more about, have do things, get into difficult situations in which they are forced to make decisions, etc. etc. J. thinks it is because what I’ve been writing is too autobiographical; he may be right. He also says it’s because I can never (have never been able to) envision a story’s ending. All of this is part of why I turned to poetry in the first place two years ago when working on the Gordon book. Shorter projects, ones where you can get a sense of completion, where the sound, word, phrase, line, stanza, syntax, and music are paramount not whether Lance would leave the Mountain Inn, go to the cemetery and stick a knife into Irene. I’m not saying there aren’t characters in poetry or story lines. Just that something different works for me when I’m working with the words that will become a poem.

Still, I’m going to keep going. My word count inched ever so slightly above 20,000 words today. That, in and of itself, says something I guess. That I am good at touch typing? That I know how to use the word count feature on MS Word?

NaNo Day #10

Saturday. Sun’s out. I see smoke from a chimney up the block so maybe that means it’s cold. It’s J.’s last day home before he goes an American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in DC all next week. There’s a big sale over at the outdoor store formerly known as G.I.Joe’s. We have library books and dry cleaning to retrieve, raking to do, a walk, and an afternoon reconnaissance of the Wordstock Book Fair down at the convention center so I won’t feel so overwhelmed going there alone for my poetry workshop at 4 pm on Sunday.

Who in their right mind would want to stay indoors and write?

After much PMS-induced carping and pewling in my journal pages, I moved on to the words. Today was mostly a cut-and-paste, stream-of-consciousness session. Nothing artful or crafted that’s for sure. I started with an old file of scatterbrained notes, added some narrative to get a character moving from the kitchen to the back porch, then using a “found text”—a very brief story written by C. back in 4th or 5th grade, moving into juxtaposing Irene’s self-indulgent, mixed-up psychic state with some news reports from Afghanistan and Iraq.

So, 1500 words later, I’ve sewn one more square in the patchwork crazy quilt that is my (likely unreadable, uninteresting) NaNoWriMo novel, that’s for sure. I would almost prefer shapeless sweater; at least it’s an item of clothing you might be able to wear. I think that’s probably the best I’m going to be able to do at least for this hormonally-challenged NaNo Week #2. Ramble on, to quote an old Led Zeppelin song.

Meanwhile, here’s something serendipitous and crazy: the theme of Fred Piscop’s November bonus crossword (for those of us who subscribe to the the New York Times puzzle online) is National Novel Writing Month. Guess the event is on the dominant culture radar screen now!

NaNo Day #11


Sunday morning and I got a late start with the NaNo pages because of this and that. I wish I felt more interested in my project. But even if I were working with different material, and a completely different cast of characters and plot line, I don’t think I’d be getting into this. I think writing a novel—at least a traditional-style, linear narrative—just isn’t for me. I’ve known this for a while and it’s a large part of the reason I switched over to memoir and poetry study a few years back. But this experience of showing up to confront the novel demons every day for a month is bringing my insight about the kind of writer I am home.

I suppose I am continuing to do NaNo in spite of this realization partly to prove to myself I can begin and complete, that I can make it to some kind of “ending” because I never did that with my grad school novel-in-progress. But what I have to remember about that project is that, indeed, I went back at least twice and thoughtfully analyzed why that project fizzled out above and beyond the fact that the story itself was boring to me and the process of writing a novel un-fun. Maybe now, once I’ve made it through NaNoWriMo, I can finally put that experience to rest. And move on.

What I also have to remember is that whatever writing I stitch together as part of this NaNo process won’t be for naught. While the NaNo pages might not hold together as a credible novel that anyone in her right mind would ever want to read, the pages can and will be seeds for other writing including poetry. Witness what happened with my poem, Sara’s Eyes. It pretty much grew out of my free writing about Irene and her obsession with an Afghan woman in a New York Times photograph. This was the scene I added to the NaNo novel’s word count yesterday as I work to deepen Irene’s character. I’m sure there will be other passages that I’ll return to and mine for other creative work.

NaNo Day #12

Today’s NaNo themes have been chapter titles and recycling. Since the structure of my novel is, for now, a crazy patchwork quilt, it makes little sense to finalize what section will end up being where. This story is jumping around in time and in and out of the minds of several of the characters, hence the 3rd person omniscient point of view. I have chunked the 88 or so pages into three parts and then tentatively numbered and named the sections (of wildly varying length and completeness, I might add) that I’ve plunked into each of those.

I have had that song by Lesley Gore—it’s my party and I’ll cry if I want to, cry if I want to, cry if I want to, you would cry too if it happened to you—in my head for days only I keep changing the lyrics to suit my situation at the moment. [By the way, what is it in that that last line?] My version for today goes something like this: they’re my words and I’ll use if I want to, use if I want to, use if I want to. You’d use them, too, if they were written by you. So that’s what I’ve done with a bit of editing, tweaking, additional writing, and deleting. Of course, I doubt I have another 22,000 words in the coffers to add to this crazy-ass project so I’m sure I’ll be back on the chain gang slogging away in the matter of a day or two. But for now, I’ve decided to do this.

And just because inquiring minds do want to know what it really is and because the Internet and google make everything literally at our fingertips in this sea of information that, one day, may drown us all, here you go:

IT’S MY PARTY Lesley Gore

Nobody knows where my Johnny has gone
Judy left the same time
Why was he holding her hand
When he’s supposed to be mine

It’s my party, and I’ll cry if I want to
Cry if I want to, cry if I want to
You would cry too if it happened to you

Playin’ my records, keep dancin’ all night
Leave me alone for a while
‘Till Johnny’s dancin’ with me
I’ve got no reason to smile

It’s my party, and I’ll cry if I want to
Cry if I want to, cry if I want to
You would cry too if it happened to you

------ LEAD BREAK ------

Judy and Johnny just walked through the door
Like a queen with her king
Oh what a birthday surprise
Judy’s wearin’ his ring

It’s my party, and I’ll cry if I want to
Cry if I want to, cry if I want to
You would cry too if it happened to you

You know, this Golden Oldie just might be more relevant to some of the story lines in my novel, Personal Effects, that I could have suspected from the fragment that I kept singing to myself. Maybe I should think about changing the title?


November 08, 2007

NaNoWriMo: Days 5, 6, 7, 8

NaNo #5

This morning’s peace quote is from Basho:

Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought.

Just another manic Monday, to quote a Bangles song I used to be most fond of way back when. Up early to drive J. downtown as he had to take luggage and then get a rental car for his three days down in Corvallis this week. Then back here for more caffeine, then a phone call and saying yes to an early lunch plan that began a half hour earlier then expected but luckily just as I was finishing up some edits to 1900+ already-crafted words.

This so-called novel is, right now, a bit of a patchwork quilt. I have taken a number of bits I had, added new fabric, then temporarily joined and spread the mess out to see where there are holes and in what ways, if any, they should be more permanently pieced together. There’s still so much to figure out, to do! A lesson I learned long ago about morning and distractions played its hand this morning and now, half past noon, I’m almost ready to shift into errand-running mode so I can get back here, do a few household tasks and then, if I’m lucky, feel this day’s second creative wind.

I think that is what I will do. Go out for a bit, then start the day over. I feel scattered and a bit out-of-focus. There’s still time to make good on this writing day yet.

One thing worth noting from the file drawer cleanup over the weekend:

It was good, even encouraging, to read comments on my fiction from the teachers I’ve worked with over the past ten years. They were pretty much unanimously complimentary. I suspect that’s a good bit of why I’m feeling OK about adding the novel material already worked over as more beads on my creative necklace. I worked hard on it way back when, had the courage to have it read and critiqued by strangers. Rather than toss it out, or belabor it more, or start everything from scratch.

A painter friend reminds me that, in this, I’ve already learned things, which is a large part of the zany goal of working on a novel in a month. And that I miss poetry. And that my old work is of good enough quality to mesh with the know. All important things.

I also skimmed another of the volumes about the writing process that I found on my bookshelves as part of unpacking after the move. No major revelations, no rocket science or contributions to understanding the origin of the universe or stars but a few decent bits of advice about the percolation process that is so key to a creative life. I think the author, a Bonni Goldberg, is correct in reminding those who word with words to spend some time figuring what aspect of the writing process you privilege. For example, I think I give more value to the creation of new material rather than the research, the mulling, the freewriting, or the revising of earlier drafts. Which would then mean (according to her ideas) that I am stressing myself out all the time by discounting those other necessary aspects which I am doing, happily and quite regularly, as part of my dedication to the writing life. Another how-to book that can join the pile of books to be sold to Powell’s or Browser’s in Corvallis but still, useful to spend some time skimming it as this Monday edged from afternoon into dark.

NaNo Day #6

It’s noon, I’ve had my low-cal tuna sandwich for lunch, the dishwasher’s loaded, and the trash is out at the curb. Now if I could just stop eating the Paul Newman’s Championship Chip cookies I foolishly bought at New Seasons yesterday afternoon. Or maybe the cookies are part of a necessary reward I somehow need now for showing up and starting the day typing away at this keyboard, adding more words to my NaNoWriMo count. Today I pretty much went right from the coma of sleep and crazy, disconnected dreams to writing. A sentence came to me that would allow me to shift from ending of yesterday’s scene to the beginning of a new one. Once I dove in with that, the words flowed.

What did I notice or learn today? Maybe it’s the sign of a fictional amateur but digression into memory, into scenes that have nothing to do with the action at hand, seem to be popping up for me more and more I wrote. At least, that’s the way the story wanted to go today. I think it’s partly because I have lots of source material, much of it somehow lodged in my psychic memory from when I worked on these ideas four or five years ago in 2002 and 2003. As a result, I’ve begun to notice that, as I am shaping scene—stringing words together in sentence after sentence to describe a setting, or report a conversation, and hopefully advance the story line as well—I am thinking something like, haven’t I already written about this, before? And lo and behold, in my fairly organized source material and previous files, I might find a shard of something to keep me going, inspire a free write or send the chapter off into an entirely new direction.

Because of the NaNoWriMo “no revising, keep on writing” mantra, I can let myself explore, even digress, without fretting at this stage about whether or not it actually makes sense or fits in, both elements of novel writing that, I think, have paralyzed my forward progress in the past. What a blessing and a relief. Very freeing to experiment and fool around, rather than fuss. I also like that I don’t have to have much of an idea of where I am going to begin my writing the next day. There is comfort in knowing that 1) I am going to show up 2) I am going to write and 3) By the end of the time I’m spend writing, the story will have inched forward in some fashion.

This morning I returned to the necklace metaphor I came up with for this story way back when. My original idea was to let myself simply string together differently shaped and crafted bits as I go along, seeing them for the individual lovely beads that they all are rather than worrying if they add up to a coherent something. I think it suits the kind of writer I am to work this—less plot-fixated, more poetic and non-linear—especially when it comes to longer narrative/prose/fiction. I even have a necklace as a model: a gorgeous strand of vintage Mardi Gras beads from when they threw glass ones to the crowds. I think I will wear it when I go to hear Krishna Das this eve. The trickiest part so far with the writing this way is figuring out how to structure it in a single document. I also had to go back through all my work days and re-do word counts. I just realized (re-noticed?) today that Microsoft Word has a tiny feature that counts the words and shows me the running tally at the bottom of my document. Duh. Now, with today and double-checking my arithmetic, the tally-to-date is now (finally) accurate.

So a bit of first thought, best thought and I was off and running this morning. And I even have notes for what I think I’ll likely work on tomorrow—the rest of the cabin cleaning scene and lunch at the Burnt Woods Cafe. Now it’s time to turn into housefrau and deal with changing the linens, putting the rest of the trash out on the curb, and folding and putting away yesterday’s batch of clean clothes.


NaNo #7

Today I think I will be noveling (is that a real word?) in two parts. My morning shift was fixing a huge hole in the narrative I realized at the end of yesterday’s marathon session: I’d made no mention of the box of dead Hank’s ashes which would surely be a presence in his house as his son and ex-wife started to clean out his personal effects. So, this morning it took a 574 words or so to start the cabin cleaning chapter differently and add Hank’s ashes as a presence, watching over them, as Miles and Irene go about their cleaning, sorting and packing up work. Since whatever I turn to next is likely to be unrelated to the cabin scene, I’m going to head out on errands in a bit. When I return, if the fog has burned off and it’s sunny, I may go on my walk to the co-op and back. If not, more words, I suspect.

Anything noted or learned this morning? It’s awfully cozy (and easier on the back) to sit and type seated on the couch in front of the gas fireplace. And it’s pretty darn easy to accumulate close to a third of the NaNo daily word count simply by returning to earlier material, fleshing it out, filling in the holes. I think this is what is meant by setting an intention for one’s writing work for any given day. Today I knew I had to deal with Hank’s box of cremains (as they are known in the death industry), that this was an object that couldn’t be MIA until the revision process. In fact, if anything, I probably need to write about it more.

NaNo #8

Simply by typing along this morning for about ninety minutes or so, I reached the daily word count. Have I mentioned yet that, unfortunately, what I’m writing totally sucks? I can already tell (even with my critic on temporary vacation) that there’s no dramatic tension, no crescendo of narrative development, that the dialogue between the mother and son as they drive to a diner is flat, and I’m definitely not selecting the most illuminating, original, to-die-for details to best depict each and every scene. Still, the word count amasses. I begin to think I’ll have no trouble getting to the 50K word count. More likely, I’ll lose interest in the project, idea, story, characters before then. Because I’m in a bit of that place now. This in spite of letting my fingers to the talking this morning and keeping my evil inner editor at bay. I edited a letter that my main character found while packing up a dead man’s files from his desk. I had two characters move boxes from the back of an SUV to a post office counter. I had them enter a diner and described the stools and booths. I stopped just before I’d actually have to have some interesting, dramatic interaction between several characters. It will be interesting to see if I begin here again tomorrow or avoid what I don’t know (don’t care to explore and find out?) about the people who, so far, have shown up in this book.

Since beginning this project a short week ago, I have noticed a pattern. The day afterthe days when I crank, when I really push and have ended up with a word count above and beyond the requisite 1667 goal, I seem only able to squeak out a tiny number of words, 500-600. There may be a lesson in this if the pattern continues for the rest of the month: stop before you burn yourself out on a single writing day so you have reserves and a desire to keep going when you return the following day. Which is a maxim I remember Jack and others talking about in grad school. And something I’m sure I already felt certain I learned other times I worked on short stories and my grad school novel. Oh well, here comes the insight yet again. Some of us take a while.

What else? There is something to be said for just plugging along and not caring if the details mesh rather than contradict one another, that the timelines are in synch, that what you’ve already made happen fits with who these characters are, what their desires and engines of purpose seem to be. There remains a part of me—and this is not a new insight, rather one I had at least five years back, the one that led me back to poetry and shorter pieces—that does not like the on and on and on process that is writing a novel. I really do prefer to begin and complete, begin again and complete. I don’t mind the revision process with a poem, where you might come back to it after a time and hear a sound differently, alter a word choice from the previous draft that now, for whatever reasons, clunks.

But the novel-as-a-form and novel-writing process feels more like an ordeal to me, what with its length, its unwieldy structure, its humans you have to care about if you want to have your reader identify with them or at least be amused by so you don’t bore yourself silly while moving them around. Maybe I’’ve always been a sprinter and not a marathon kind of gal. And all of this is perfectly OK. It’s part of why I wanted to do this NaNoWriMo in the first place, to compress my sorting out the kind of writing I prefer in the short, efficient span of a single month. And why I’m doing these daily blogs, to try and chart what I feel I’m learning, what insights are bubbling up. Not that I expect any surprises; I already have a pretty good idea of what I’ll conclude. I guess I’d just like to make peace, once and for all, with the whole open-ended blah blah blah indecisiveness as to what kind of writer I truly am. And then to get on with that.

May 02, 2007

August Wilson on the Importance of Craft

We saw August Wilson's play Fences at Portland Center Stage a few weeks back. Before going, I read the Paris Review interview with him from. This response to the qualities that make a playwright spoke to me and seems of use for all creative writers as we work:

"Honesty. Something to say and the courage to say it. The will and daring to accomplish great art. Craft. Craft is what makes the will and daring work and allows playwrights to shout or whisper as they choose. A painter who has not mastered line and form, mass, perspective and proportion, who does not understand the values and properties of color, is not going to produce interesting paintings no matter the weight and measure of his heart, or the speed and power of his intellect. I don't think you can ever know too much about craft...All that is necessary then is ambition...which is as valid and valuable as anything else."

June 22, 2006

A Useful Checklist

Here's something valuable from Bob Haynes, teacher of the Daydreams poetry class through Writers on the Net -- a checklist to use in evaluating poems you write as well as read:

1. Why should the reader move from the first into the second line?

2. Is the language fresh, does the piece create mood, tone, image, a sense of journey and provocation?

3. Who are you? Who are they, the things?

4. Is it your own voice in the poem, or one of them, is it original to your own imagination?

5. Watch for stereotyping, easy emotion, sentimentality, clichéd phrases. Get to the gut of it. Cut the rest—the trick is significant details. Emphasis on the Significant, i.e., why does this poem matter?

6. Where are we? What time is it?

7. Are you working with literal or figurative images? What is the central metaphor if you are working with tropes? Do you stay inside the language of the similes, metaphors, metonyms?

8. What’s the weather? Are the verbs moving, kinetic or clichéd, overused, bought up?

9. Is it self-conscious? Faulkner put it this way: “Kill your darlings.” Yes, darling. Don’t get carried away with the lines, images or the music.

10. Observe. Participate—stay inside the work. Let us feel your own sense of surprise, longing, grief, joy.

11. Trust your own voices. Discover new ways of saying it.

12. Where is it too drawn out?

13. Suggest rather than explain your meanings.

14. Don’t rationalize every nuance or aspect of the voice, the image, the action—the meditation for that matter.

15. More than what is necessary is too much. Every word, line, image, stanza should contribute to moving the poem’s underlying imagination into its vision.

16. Where is it undeveloped? What facts/feelings are missing? What particulars and gestures are incomplete, metaphors obscure, images off the mark?

17. Was it too painful, a certain memory, the first time you wrote about a painful moment? Where does the poem become too abrupt, where does it lose its momentum?

18. Keep that element of discovery, your own discovery, working in every word. You can start all over when you revise. You may end up with two poems to revise.

19. Where is it too abstract? Strive to recognize your vague passes. Particular things, sizes, degrees, objects, suns, moons, sons…

20. Let each thing have its own expression, place, being in the writing. This requires great observational skills: listening, seeing, touching, tasting.

May 09, 2006

The Rivers That Run Through It

... my current writing that is, themes, recurring ideas, obsessions, ways I work with words. What I seem drawn to explore, what I return to, over and again. These observations were culled from work done in recently completed Part II Daydreams poetry class I took with Bob Haynes.

-- What I’ve taken to calling “threshold” moments in life—and not just the obvious ones like giving birth or someone’s death but those times when you know you are living through moments that will change you and your life from here on out.

--Eyes and what they see as witness. I try to paint pictures of what I see, what stands out to me. To push beyond the surface or to notice what is on the surface and celebrate that. Part of this is about teaching myself to pay attention.

--“Found texts” including scraps of dialogue and writing, from strangers, from other arenas of life, maybe even from other poems?

--Sound, what I can hear, the rhythmic current that runs through life, the pulse, the backbeat. The sound that’s there even when we believe we’re in silence. The way words crash into one another, making music or noise.

--Dance and movement, and words about dance. To make things move and sway that wouldn’t ordinarily do that in life.

--Textures, words that look as well as sound, that give a three-dimensional thickness to the line, the phrase.

--What’s below the surface. The rough, unpolished, raw. The pith and marrow. What isn’t easily reduced to black and white.

--My journey to where I am now. What I was willing to give up, what I have lost, what I gathered up instead.

April 04, 2006

About My Poetry Writing Process

We've been sorting out our poetry aesthetics and the way we work, and where we get ideas in my on-line poetry class. It's interesting work, to step back and try to assess and sum up what I observe, what I sense, the way I work.

Here's what I've noticed so far.

About My Aesthetic

Poetry for me is a recording of moments, a way to make sense of what I’ve felt, experienced, and lived. Writing a poem begins with meandering—a journey through objects, moments, memories—my fingers taking dictation from my subconscious, I guess, some kind of first-draft language I hear in my head.

I love to play with words: their sounds and shapes, their look on a page, the space a poem inhabits, the musicality of letter and syllable, phrase and line. I am drawn to unexpected juxtapositions. I like what unrelated objects side-by-side can reveal; it’s a bonus when they dance and sing. I believe less is more, and seek to select and winnow in favor of the “one truer thing.” Some of the poems I write seem also to be bursting at the their English language seams!

Personally, I look to poems for insight and wisdom, to explain what it means to be deeply human, to remind me of universal connections to our shared humanity. Reading a poem remains, for me, a way to stop and find my breath.

Where I Get Ideas and What I Write About

I often come up with a single line that starts me in on the idea for a poem. Sometimes it’s something as basic as a rhythm or a sound. I try to listen and follow that around for a bit. I’m drawn to investigate congruence between something I’m experiencing now and long-ago events in my own life or in the historical record, to see what, if any, links I can make between the two. Other times I have a sketchy sense of something I want to write about and begin with that.

Writing about other people, I’m drawn to the mysterious and the thorny. The relationships that confound or sadden or disappoint me are the ones I want to further explore, to try and understand. There are certain subjects and landscapes that, I think, are beginning to recur in my work because of who I am, where I came from, what it took me to get here, and how I live now. These include the river I grew up on, the mines beneath my home valley, the flood I was in as a young girl, the tall trees that surround me now. I think, increasingly, I'm preoccupied with "threshold" moments in life—and not just the obvious ones like giving birth or someone's death but those times when you know you are living through moments that will change you and your life from here on out. There are certain losses that have stayed with me, defined me. I suspect they are the wellspring of much of my art.

As I say on my web site, I also often write about journeys and seeking, serendipity and mistake, exile and home, abandonment and connection. I write about feeling like an observer, an outsider, out-of-synch with the mainstream world. I write in search of what I know but keep forgetting. I like to ask questions even though I’m fully aware there are no answers. I often write about getting lost and finding my way. I would like to have my poems inhabit both the personal and the universal.

I've begun to think that some of my recent work has grown out of material I've been working with off and on, consciously and unconsciously, for a long, long time. It's almost as if the poems were in me, writing themselves slowly and quietly while I worked on the outside to develop the skills to get them down, the skill to better pay attention. It's now so obvious to me—from the language and images and objects and memories I've been capturing—that many of these subjects would never have found their real home in prose.

How I Work

It’s still an astonishing process to me, the way you begin not knowing where you are going, maybe with a few scribbles, notes on a memory, a word, an anything dredged from the past and, through risk and concentration, fiddling and reading out loud, trying a bit of this, tinkering with a bit of that, you find yourself onto something, or at least enough of a something that it feels OK to “put it out there” to see what other eyes and ears have to say, how it reads to them.

Most of the time, I use free-writing as a way to get into the flow of words. Beginnings have always been difficult for me. I do much better if I can start from “something” even rudimentary rather than “nothing.” Lately, I find myself going back to things I wrote earlier—notes, a story, an exercise, an essay, a journal entry—and begin from that.

I usually start with writing by hand and let myself riff on a subject or a question I might want to know more about, a moment, memory, or object I want to explore. Often from this unedited, unchecked exercise, something more I can work with will emerge. If anything is a surprise, an unexpected revelation, I pay extra attention to that. I look for what is strange, what seems uncommon to me. I then start back through, sifting the sandbox of my collected language, shaping the phrases and lines somewhere between a sculptor and a potter. That’s often when I lose myself in the “flow” of doing the work; it gets hard for me to explain my “process” beyond that.

I know I get visual, especially once I see the words here on the laptop. And I cut and paste and shift and re-arrange. And I read whatever I've got out loud and over and over—a lot. Some words seem right from the beginning. Others clunk or sound off so I fiddle and tinker, perhaps a bit obsessively. Things like should it be a or the? present or past tense? alliteration here or forsake that? is the word, sound, phrasing only appealing to me or will a reader respond to it as well? I think I am very much the beginner when it comes to understanding how best to structure a poem to evoke a response in a potential reader. I wonder if some of this has to do with audience. Who am I writing for? Myself? An ideal reader? My twin who gets all my references, is familiar with all my quirks, my tales? A particular person, someone I know or knew (now that G's dead)?

It does seem like I often get part of a poem "right" or "close to right" (whatever that means) pretty early on in the first draft. But beyond that, it also seems like it could take the rest of life, if not forever, to know if it's done. I guess that's the mystery and the madness. The thing is: I find more joy in this process than I ever did, all those years trying to write prose. And it doesn’t seem as difficult, as hard, as painful and frustrating and dragging on, forever and ever amen—in spite of all the admonitions in all the how-to poetry books about how difficult writing poetry truly is. Now, when I look back at my fiction, the better examples are the ones I tinkered with, honed and shaped on the page, line by line by line, as if they were one sinuous epic poem.

February 08, 2006

Cutting and Pasting

Does that count as writing? I don't think so. But today it was necessary, my collating, almost secretarial efforts to see what, if anything, can emerge from one, two, hell, almost eight years of sitting here, writing, talking to myself I thought but maybe just maybe the ramblings are something others would want to read. I probably have more than 100 pages of material, seriously in need of editing of course. But still, that's some mighty keyboarding fingers, spewing out thought after thought, observation upon observation. Isn't that what this life is about, each day finding a tactic, a slant, an urge and an edge as you move forward, one letter, word, sentence, paragraph at a time? With a huge dollop of merciless self-editing, of course. Imagine what the girl could accomplish if she really put her mind to something she cared about, felt passionate about, believed in.

A Way to Improve Your Writing

A few months ago I read some sage advice in "Writing Without Teachers" by Peter Elbow.

He says "to improve your writing you don't need advice about what changes to make; you don't need theories of what is good and bad writing. You need movies of people's minds while they read your words. But you need this for a sustain period of time -- at least 2 or 3 months. And you need to get the experience of not just 2 people but at least 6 or 7. And you need to keep getting it from the same people so that they get better at transmitting their experience and you get better at hearing them. And you must writing something EVERY week...if you only learn how people perceive and experience words you are satisfied with, you are missing a crucial area of learning."

This argues for sharing one's messy first, second, and third drafts, doesn't it?

January 12, 2006

My Revised Poetry Aesthetic

Finishing up the tenth week of the outstanding Bob Haynes/Writers on the Net Class: "Daydreams: How Poetry Works." Bob asked us to revise the statement of our poetry aesthetic from the first week of class, to see how (if at all) it had changed from what we'd learned, the work we'd done. Below is my new aesthetic as well as my Top Ten list of things I feel the course experience showed me. In some ways, I was already on track when I began. But there have been revelations, particularly in the areas of letting go and following words around, not caring so much what they mean, what sense they make.

Revised Aesthetic Statement (January 2006)

Poetry for me is a recording of moments, a way to make sense of what I've felt, witnessed, and lived. Writing a poem begins with meandering--a journey through a world of objects, moments, memories--my fingers taking dictation from my subconscious, the language I hear in my head.

I love to play with words: their sounds and shapes, their look on a page, the space a poem inhabits, the musicality of letter and syllable, phrase and line. I am drawn to unexpected juxtapositions; I like when unrelated objects dance and sing. I believe less is more, seek to select and winnow in favor of the "one truer thing."

I look to poems for insight and wisdom, to explain what it means to be human, deeply human.* Reading a poem remains, for me, a way to stop and take a breath.

* Thanks to Bob Haynes for this lovely language.

Ten more things learned about my writing (and my aesthetic) in this class:

1. More play, less intellect. More tinkering, less cast-in-concrete. More mystery, less concern with meaning and making sense. More following the words and music around where they (not necessarily I) want to go.

2. Concrete objects jog writing, offer a place to start. 

3. Line and stanza breaks have power, to (as Bob said) "slow the poem, show little leaps of thought occurring."

4. Poetic "rightness" can sometimes be found by a simple re-arrangement of stanza, line, individual word, even a syllable shift.

5. The English language is unusually malleable. Nouns can be verbs can be adjectives, that sort of thing. The word you are seeking may simply be a different form of the one you've got. Effectively deployed "grammatical brushstrokes" can make all the difference in the world.

6. It's OK to tinker to get the syntax and flow of a poem just right.

About my writing in particular:

7. I trust more that my subconscious will reveal the bigger, deeper subject to me, Richard Hugo's triggering town.

8. I am personally (surprisingly?) willing to experiment, to take risks. And willing to dig in a poem for what carries the most emotional weight.

9. I like the disruption of expectation that comes from putting the disparate side by side.

10. Readers often respond to where I let myself "riff" in a poem.

Initial Aesthetic Statement (November 2005)

Poetry for me is witness, a recording of moments, a way to climb out of and maybe even try to explain myself, what I've witnessed, what I've lived. I am drawn to unexpected juxtapositions that take me by surprise, and force me to reflect on meaning. I love words: their sounds and shapes, their look on a page, the space a poem inhabits, the musicality of letter and syllable, phrase and line. I like poetry's specificity, its idiosyncrasy, and its mystery. And the pictures its imagery can paint behind my eyes. I look to poems for insight, wisdom, and truth. Reading a poem is often like stopping and taking a deep breath.

December 22, 2005

Suddenly I’m Into Hyphenation

And not in a way to break up words but to cobble together nouns, adjectives and prepositions to make new hybrid somethings, words or phrases, I guess. When did this come about? turn into a pattern, a stylistic tic for me? Is it laziness on my part, not wanting to search around for a more perfect, apt single word? Or is it me wanting to have fun, inject a spirit of colloquial play into whatever I'm writing? Could hypens be part of my style, my voice? Or does it simply show I'm an indecisive, imprecise writer, too lazy to sift and wait for the right word?

December 21, 2005

The Poem Turns on a Sneeze

Really, I'm not kidding. I was about to give up in sheer frustration. Hours spent this morning re-reading chapters in Hugo's Triggering Town, free-writing who the Fog and Wonder Woman Pez might really be, looking for inspiration in my original list of objects, ransacking a list of "what I love" poetry prompts originally scripted in Allegra Wong's Writers Block class a year back. But I sneezed and wrote that into the poem and then let myself riff, a scene in a diner, it could be anywhere except that it was a meeting between a dead person and the person left behind and, over their otherworldly meal, they eavesdrop and observe and the narrator tries to make sense of the depth and breadth of her loss. I pushed through to some other side and then got brave enough or exhausted enough with the whole damn process to put the revision out there and lo and behold, the teacher says it's a keeper, better than to be hoped for in a typical second draft. I couldn't have done it without his advice about seeking the deeper, underlying subject. When will this become second nature, when will I be able to conjure up such analysis on my own? I feel like I'm stuck in the role of student, forever in need of a wise person mentor. Practice does make for perfect, well not, perfect but at least perfecting my sense and my ear. So that's my work for this first day of December, 50 years after Rosa Parks refused to go to the back of the bus. I guess I'm slowly learning, it's all in the view out the window, the list from a year before, the carefully scripted sneeze.

November 30, 2005

The Mystery That This Writing Is...

For last week's online poetry class, the teacher asked us to work with a list of objects then find a way to construct a poem out of them. I looked around the room where I write, the living room, the kitchen and over an afternoon composed a list of 40 or 50 random, unconnected things. Then the next day, sat down to do some freewriting, to see what words would emerge, what sounds, what music that might find its way to be shaped into some kind of poem. From the longer list, here's what I ended up using,

-- the remote for the Bose radio I listen to while writing each morning
-- sand dollars found on the Georgia coast
-- a lump of anthracite coal
-- the day of the dead skeleton sitting at a desk, typing, my writing talisman
-- the wording on a box of cotton bond paper
-- the Lewis and Clark commemorative nickel on my desk
-- the Amazon.com box filled with travel stuff for our April Adriatic trip
-- boarding passes from our trip to Kaua'i tacked onto the bulletin board next to the big computer where I've been working since my iBook died
-- the Wonder Woman pez I got from Denise and Paul for my 40th birthday that sits on top of the bulletin board. Paul (the brother of Jack my ex who died 3 days before his 50th birthday November 8th)

I started writing from the Richard Hugo line cited in his Triggering Town essay and let my own words roll from there. The train horn in the distance, the fog outside the window and then, from a random collection, a story emerges about the fog and Wonder Woman meeting somewhere for lunch. Surprisingly fun and the poem itself not half-bad. I wasn't sure if it meant anything but still...I'd gotten the exercise done.

Now, this week for class, we are to search more for the underlying subject -- beyond the triggering objects that got us into the writing -- and to focus on the integrity of each and every line. As part of doing that, I decided to learn more about Wonder Woman. Beyond the sillly Pez memento/talisman I keep here in my writing room, all I knew was that she was a superhero girl in a sexy get-up on a television show I never watched.

So here's where some of the coolness, the creative serendipity comes in, what makes this writing cool for me:

Wonder Woman was created in the 1940s, a feminist figure, with ties back to the AMAZON tribe of warriors as Diana/Artemis of Roman/Greek mythology. She was featured on the cover of the first Ms. magazine in 1971, my senior year of high school, and Gloria Steinem wrote an essay in that issue about her character. In the 1970s, there was also a connection to the I Ching, a tie-in to the Kung Fu, television series, one of the only things I watched during that time, trekking with G. or Snake over to French House because Harkness didn't have a T.V. There's a whole thing about Wonder Woman's techniques being about loving submission and agape by 1947. Agape meaning love that is wholly selfless and spiritual or the selfless love felt by Christians for their fellow human beings -- one of the only aspects of Christianity that I personally can continue to embrace. And also the mention of the original creator's unconventional relationship with his wife and another eccentric woman and the ways he chose to depict this first female super hero's sexuality. The newest Wonder Woman series was cancelled this month, November 2005 to be re-born and re-configured some time in 2006. Now don't tell me there isn't some muse working behind the scenes, manipulating meaning-laced strings?

Who wouldn't thought a Pez dispenser could lead to a potential series of poems? And I don't even read comics, have long said I don't like them. Maybe becoming a Wonder Woman afficionado will be a new goal for my 50th year. I certainly feel compelled to stick with, continue working on, this poem.

October 11, 2005

Follow the Musical Thread...

...and the meaning will be there. That's an interesting thing to reflect on as I try to figure out this whole poetry meaning thing. Richard Hugo asks -- Is sound a guide to discover meaning in a poem or rather is meaning used as a way to justify the chosen sounds? How is it I have been working my own primitive journey to find my way back to the word?

I started writing Pilgrimage out of a desire to capture an epiphany moment, to find meaning in an experience that began as painful and ended (unexpectedly) in the profound. But from the start I chose poetry rather than narrative. From the start, I heard the word angel (not a word I use often) for the neighbor and that she was there, hovering -- I remember thinking of her as a benevolence -- and then the words, sounds -- the musical thread I guess -- flowed from trying to capture that. Then, by the time I got to the end of a few more drafts, sound had taken over, come into sharper relief. Not in an abstract, arbitrary way, but as a way to augment the meaning? the story? I'd already been trying to tell. So I guess in my poem this week, the inspiration, the intention, the triggering town was my unexpected meeting of the neighbor and the poem's real subject ends up being, as Mary Ann wrote to me, "I have the sense, however, that the “angel” is more helpful to the narrator than to the unseen person who killed himself."


October 01, 2005

Ancient Insights, Still Relevant

Back at the desk, daily, working on assorted things. Playful poetry, mining prose about the Valley to turn into anthracite prose poems, and re-immersing myself in the project about G. I spent one morning last week looking back over seven years of insights culled from working with the creativity coach, from getting up and coming to this desk mostly day in and out. I wrote in 1998 or 1999: "A good day for me is about feeling heard and understood. It's about stimulation and connection." Interesting: so many themes surface again and again. Does that mean I'm dense, that it's taking me forever to make changes, or does it mean I'm incapable of change? Does it mean I knew a while back a better recipe for success for my writing life and I've been stubborn about embracing it? All I know is that the review was useful -- I feel like I've got a list of directives I should now tattoo on the inside of my left arm.

So for what it's worth, here's my new, improved writing wisdom list: what I've figured out, what I know works for me and also what trips me up. Over and over and over and over again. What I need, what would help me work better:

21st Century Nora O'Floinn Writing Wisdom List

-- Read poetry in the morning, start of my writing day.

-- Need audience. Write to someone, real or imagined.

-- Dare to write and complete first, messy drafts.

-- Assign prompts and homework. Perhaps a daily page number or word count?

-- Go deeply into fewer things.

-- Stop trying to force.

-- Limit travel and disruptions; expect transition time after they occur.

-- Don't discount my story: outsider, observing, often other.

-- So often desperate to be good at something, to be recognized, and seen as worthy.

-- I keep losing the laughter. Why?

Ancient Insights, from those longago 90s

-- My best work? Focused on the specific and the concrete.

-- Turn to writing exercises when my will, drive, and enthusiasm fail me.

-- Gossip and detective work often two keys to generating writing.

-- Stream of consciousness for prodding memories.

-- When I travel, my journal details are livelier, more interesting.

-- Still caring too much about outcomes.

-- Patience rather than forcing the words to come.

-- Too much fretting about getting the words "right."

-- Music heals, jolts free associations.

-- Explore artists who have creativity in multiples areas.

-- When I DO things, the writing is better.

-- Writing from a random poetry line? Generative for me.

-- When rigid about daily schedules, I freeze up.

June 30, 2005

Artist's Prayers

In 1998, when I moved to Oregon, I knew I wanted the time to write but it can be easier said than done to move from the 9 to 5 to sitting in a house in the woods day in and day out, creating a "self-directed" life. So I spent several months going through Julia Cameron's book The Artist's Way. While some of its "12-step" sensibility gets a little bit preachy (and thus on my nerves) I found many of the exercises and her suggestions such as morning pages and weekly artist dates most helpful.

In that book, Cameron suggests writing an Artist's Prayer, words that have meaning for you, that you can turn to, read, and re-read, for inspiration and re-inspiration whenever your stamina or desire to write falters. At the time the exercise sounded a bit corny--I'm not particularly religious and definitely not in the habit of praying --but I decided to try writing one anyway. Since 1998, I have written four prayers. They've evolved: in the beginning I wasn't even sure I had a voice of my own. Now, after years of showing up at the page, the keyboard, I need help with other struggles. Below is my "prayer" for 2005. If you'd like to see any of the others, let me know.

O Great Creator,

Now that the muse has handed me what undoubtedly is my subject, guide me and encourage me through all the tempests that will be part of seeing this project to the end. All signs from the universe are pointing to the fact that what I’ve borne witness to in my life is worth sharing with the world. Help me to have faith that I have everything I need already inside me and that it will come tumbling
out when I put my pen to paper, fingers to the keyboard, and that I will not only recognize it but know how to shape it when it does.

Allow me to believe and accept that the writing work is as simple as showing up every day with concrete goals, that this routine and discipline is the writing work. Forever remind me to find joy not only seriousness when I work with words. And help me to forgive myself when I stray, when I let disruptions derail and distract.

Give me the courage to reveal my self, my heart, my deepest truths—all that I’ve loved and love, lived and forgotten, found and lost. Remind me to regularly honor the knowledge that I am already well on my way to writing in my original and authentic voice. And that, in due time, I will release my work, with confidence and bravery, into the world.

June 13, 2005

Return to a Writing Routine

Travel really disrupts my writing routine. I know this and still head off to Northern Thailand for Songkran, to Kaua'i for a Bali Hai vacation with my husband, on a road trip to Boise, Idaho to eat a few nice meals, view art in the downtown streets and search, in vain, for fields of potatoes. It's been two solid months of distraction and upheaval thanks to running around the globe, living out of a suitcase. But now I'm back, ready to sit here at my desk, and dive in.

My ritual for getting back to work seems to go something like this:

-- Deal with the piles. Books that haven't been fit into their proper spot on the shelves. Piles of errant paper, everything from receipts I'm saving in case I make money writing this year and can deduct expenses from my taxes to interesting articles clipped from newspapers and magazine. Notebooks, notebooks, notebooks: does every writer have as many as I do. And then the bags -- I swear I've begun to use the totes handed out by everyone from the Oregon Shakespeare Festival to Tin House last summer as a bizarre sort of filing system. If only I can remember which project is stashed in which one. So Monday was sorting and filing and re-arranging and finding the top of my cherry desk again.

-- Remember where I left off, whenever that was, wherever that was. What was I working on? What were the project priorities? Where did I think the memoir was headed next? I seem to need to re-group and review outlines and notes and topics I thought were next especially in the memoir project.

-- Clean up file folders. Make sure the words on the labels really reflect whatever is inside. This is a key organizational detail for me whenever I'm in the midst of a big project. I often forget how much work I've already done because I stuff the notes and print-outs and brainstorms in file folders and give them a cryptic label that means nothing to me even a week later when I try to figure out what I'm going to do next.

-- Review all I've done to date, my source material, etc. Even if this is just a cursory overview. It's a kind of taking stock to remind me of how much hard work I've already gotten done. BEFORE I disappeared to fly the friendly skies. Before I drove I-84 to look for some alternative America that included fields of potatoes.

-- Find one small project that's been hanging around forever to work on and finish that. I'm doing that with the poem I was writing, oddly enough, the days in May 2003 when it turned out G was killing himself. I remember being so happy to work on the poem that day, then I set it aside and it had languished through all the events and ups and downs of daily life since then. So today, I'm going to finish it and, at the very least, post it on this blog.

-- Start small on my bigger, longer project, which, right now is The Muse of Hanging. What Annie Lamott in Bird by Bird says to do is simply describe the one-inch picture in a frame. That's all you have to aim for on any given writing day. No more, no less. And in time the words will accumulate.

-- Keep my mornings free and clear, and most of my days to and for myself. My writing seems to flow better when I have these open stretches of time rather than minor, often self-induced disruptions like running errands that really can wait.